News

Standard thickness a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel

Standard thickness a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel

  • Jan 14 , 2021
The company adopts modern management concept, adheres to “quality for survival, integrity for development”, and provides customers with high-quality and reliable steel a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel products and wholehearted service. The

The company adopts modern management concept, adheres to “quality for survival, integrity for development”, and provides customers with high-quality and reliable steel a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel products and wholehearted service. The company continuously deepens the internal reform of the enterprise, innovates in the reform, develops in the innovation, and gradually forms a set of management and operation mechanism which adapts to the a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel market and has strong competitiveness.

The company uses outsourced logistics operations. Our cooperated professional third-party logistics providers use the advantages of large-scale production and cost advantages to achieve cost savings by increasing the utilization of resources in each link, so that we can benefit from the separation of cost structure. Therefore, we can also provide customers with better, faster and more efficient cargo transportation, delivery, and lower freight costs.

The wear-resistant plate has the main advantages of high strength and hardness, good toughness, a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel high tensile strength, good material wear-resistance, long service life and low cost. In order to verify the wear-resistant life of the high wear-resistant composite steel plate applied in the field, the comparative industrial test of a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel wear-resistant with the ordinary carbon plate was carried out on the reclaimer of Jigang raw material plant, and the effect is good.

We supply 3500 tons SA387GR5CL1 steel plates to Pakistan. The main businesses of the Pakistan customer are manufacturing columns & towers, heat exchanger, waste heat recovery boiler, pressure vessel & reactors, tanks, etc. We arranged SGS test for the SA387GR5CL1 steel plates. The test contents include chemical composition analysis, tensile test, impact test, etc. The test results are satisfied. The Pakistan customer gave good feedback after receiving the SA387GR5CL1 steel plates.

asme sa514 gr E high-yield structural steel element composition%
C: 0.12-0.20, Si: 0.20-0.40, Mn: 0.40-0.70, P max.: 0.035, S max.: 0.035, Cr: 1.40-2.00, Mo: 0.40-0.60, Ti: 0.01-0.10, Cu: 0.15-0.50, B: 0.001-0.005
The mechanical properties in thickness (mm)T≤65
Yield strength (≥Mpa): 690
Tensile strength (Mpa):760-895
Elongation in ≥,%: 18

Aspire to technological innovation and pursue first-class quality steel a572 alloy steel vs a656 alloy steel products.Take independent innovation as an important support for the sustainable development of iron and steel industry, strengthen the main position of technological innovation, accelerate the original innovation, integrated innovation, introduction, digestion, absorption and re innovation, improve the technological innovation system, and cultivate the core technology and brand products of independent intellectual property rights.

Leave A Comment